DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
704 $, COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
JBH :
Docket No. NR5380-13
11 March 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
10 March 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1770 RMED dated
a, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. in
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained. in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be-
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
‘reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
‘applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely.
TR ened, Fon
ROBERT D.~ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: HQMC Memo 1770 RMED dated Ty
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7111 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were also provided an opportunity to respond within 30 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7962 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by HQMC Memo 1070 MMSB-13 dated Ge a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6243 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo MPO dated a a copy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5408 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014.. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0823 13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. Documentary material considered by-the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6803 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 13 February 2015 and HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 18 November 2014, copies of which are attached. NR6803-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6114 14
Documentary materia considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6114-14 a correction of an official naval he applicant to demonstrate the existence of Consequently, when applying for record, the burden is on t probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6707 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7169 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 7220 MPO of a copy of which is attached. — Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official nava exis Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0326 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO0O0326-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...